The counsel for Hamdard apprised the court that recently, while promoting Patanjali’s gulab sharbat, Ramdev claimed that the money earned from Hamdard’s Rooh Afza was used to build madrasas and mosques.
Later, Ramdev defended his remark and said that he did not name any brand or community.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Hamdard, said the case goes beyond disparagement and it was a case of creating “communal divide”.
“This amounts to hate speech. He says it is a sharbat jihad. He should carry on his business. Why is he troubling us?” the senior lawyer said.
As the counsel who had to argue the case for Ramdev was not available, the court would take up the matter again after some time. PTI SKV RHL
