In a recent development that could have major implications for creative freedom and political commentary in Indian cinema, the Madras High Court has issued a notice to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) over the Tamil film Manushi, directed by acclaimed filmmaker Vetrimaaran. The court’s intervention follows a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the CBFC’s certification of the film, which is alleged to depict sensitive political themes involving caste and communal issues.
In This Article:
What is Manushi About?
Though Manushi has not yet been released in theatres, industry insiders suggest that the film delves into socio-political issues surrounding caste discrimination, custodial violence, and systemic injustice. Vetrimaaran, known for films like Visaranai and Asuran, is no stranger to politically charged narratives, and Manushi appears to continue that tradition.
The PIL claims that the film’s content may disturb public order, particularly in Tamil Nadu’s sensitive socio-political landscape.
Court’s Query to CBFC
The Madras High Court bench, comprising Chief Justice S.V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad, has asked the CBFC to file a response clarifying:
- The grounds on which Manushi was certified.
- Whether the CBFC reviewed the film’s political and caste-based content thoroughly.
- If any expert opinions were sought during certification.
The court emphasized that while artistic freedom is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, it must be balanced with the responsibility to maintain public harmony.
Vetrimaaran’s Stand on the Controversy
Vetrimaaran has not issued an official statement yet. However, sources close to the filmmaker maintain that Manushi has followed due process and secured a proper CBFC certification. They argue that raising objections now, post-certification, infringes upon the filmmaker’s freedom of expression.
Legal experts note that CBFC certifications can only be overturned in rare instances where there is a clear and imminent threat to public peace.
Broader Implications
This case reignites debate on the role of the CBFC and judiciary in regulating cinematic content in India. With Manushi yet to hit theatres, the outcome of this legal scrutiny could set a precedent for future films addressing contentious topics.
Key Points
- Manushi is alleged to portray sensitive political and caste themes.
- A PIL questions the legitimacy of its CBFC certification.
- Madras High Court has asked the CBFC to explain the certification process.
- The court’s response will influence whether Manushi proceeds unchallenged or faces restrictions.
As the case unfolds, all eyes are on the Madras High Court’s next move and CBFC’s detailed reply. The final verdict will not only decide the fate of Manushi but could also impact the creative boundaries of Indian cinema going forward.
By – Nikita
