Telugu superstar Chiranjeevi has found himself in the middle of a storm after making a statement about wanting a male grandchild to carry forward his family’s legacy. The comment, which was made during the pre-release event of the film Brahma Anandam, has led to widespread criticism. Many have accused the actor of propagating gender bias, reinforcing patriarchal values, and devaluing the role of daughters in family legacies.
Social media users, activists, and political leaders have condemned his remarks, calling them sexist and outdated. While some fans argue that his comments were made in jest, others believe they reflect deep-seated misogyny. The controversy has since snowballed, sparking heated debates on gender equality and cultural bias in India.
What Did Chiranjeevi Say?
At the event, Chiranjeevi spoke about his family, particularly his granddaughters, in a way that many found problematic. His exact words were:
“When I’m at home, it doesn’t feel like I’m surrounded by my granddaughters; it feels like I’m a ladies’ hostel warden, surrounded by ladies all around. I keep wishing and telling (Ram) Charan, at least this time, to have a boy so that our legacy continues. I’m scared that he might again have a girl, but he has lovely kids.”
This statement, which suggests that a male heir is necessary to uphold a family’s name and prestige, did not sit well with the public. Critics argue that such comments reinforce gender stereotypes and imply that daughters are not as valuable in carrying forward a family’s name.
Public Reaction: Backlash on Social Media
Chiranjeevi’s remarks led to an immediate backlash across Twitter (X), Instagram, and Facebook. Netizens expressed their disappointment, calling his views outdated, sexist, and reflective of deep-rooted gender bias in Indian society.
Trending Hashtags & Comments
- #ChiranjeeviMisogynyUnmasked
- #GenderEquality
- #DaughtersAreLegaciesToo
- #OutdatedMindset
One Twitter user wrote:
“It’s 2025, and we still have people believing only a son can carry forward a legacy? Women have been excelling in every field. This mindset is exactly why we need gender equality education!”
Another said:
“Daughters are as much a part of the family as sons. If a girl’s presence in a family feels like a ‘ladies’ hostel,’ then perhaps it is time to change your thinking, not wish for a boy!”
Many pointed out that several Indian women leaders, business tycoons, and film stars have carried forward their families’ legacies. Names like Indira Nooyi, Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, Priyanka Gandhi, and Deepika Padukone were brought up as examples of women who have led their families with distinction.
Political Leaders Condemn Chiranjeevi’s Statement
Chiranjeevi’s remarks did not go unnoticed in political circles. Several politicians and activists voiced their disapproval.
- Jebi Mather (Congress MP):
“It is very sad and unfortunate that a public figure like Chiranjeevi believes only a male child can carry forward a legacy. Boys and girls are equally capable and should be treated as such.” - Brinda Karat (CPI-M leader):
“This is crass and sexist. Celebrities should be more responsible with their words. Statements like these reinforce outdated beliefs that harm gender equality.”
Activists emphasized that such comments not only perpetuate gender discrimination but also contribute to societal pressure on women to give birth to male children—a mindset that has historically led to female infanticide and gender imbalance in India.
Supporters Defend Chiranjeevi
While many have condemned the actor, some fans and industry colleagues have defended him. They argue that his words were taken out of context and that he meant no harm.
Arguments in Support of Chiranjeevi:
- “It was just a joke” – Some supporters claim that the comment was light-hearted and should not be taken too seriously.
- “Personal preference is not discrimination” – Others argue that Chiranjeevi’s wish for a grandson does not mean he disrespects girls.
- “Social media overreacts” – A few believe that canceled culture and online outrage often blow issues out of proportion.
However, gender equality advocates insist that even “casual” sexist remarks help reinforce deep-seated societal biases.
Broader Cultural Implications
This controversy has reignited discussions about gender bias and patriarchy in Indian society.
- Preference for Male Heirs – Despite progress, many Indian families still view male children as successors while daughters are often married off.
- Women Carrying Family Legacy – Many Indian women have built successful businesses, led political movements, and carried forward family names, proving that legacy is not gender-specific.
- Celebrity Influence – Public figures like Chiranjeevi hold massive influence, and their words can shape societal norms.
Chiranjeevi’s remarks have triggered important conversations about gender equality, tradition, and societal progress. While his comments may not have been intended to offend, they highlight the need for changing mindsets about family legacies and the role of daughters in society.
As India moves forward, many hope that this controversy will lead to greater awareness about the importance of gender neutrality and equal respect for sons and daughters.
ALSO READ – India-Pakistan Ceasefire Violation Along LoC
